Featured

Sayat demisse message

ow
895 Views
Published

To look at an understudy's point of view on ePortfolio, we made a web-based review that was shipped off three unique classes of the course "Computerized innovations in VET-programs". The study was a subjective poll with ten open inquiries, asking the respondents for explanations on points like difficulties and potential outcomes of ePortfolio, capabilities required to make an ePortfolio, and their own meaning of the idea "ePortfolio". Two of the classes had finished the course in pre-winter 2016 and the last class was the current class in spring 2017. We messaged a connection to the internet based study to each of the 48 understudies in the three classes. Three messages were returned in light of the fact that the addresses the understudies had given were at this point not being used. Of the then 45 potential replies, we got 15, which adds up to a reaction pace of 33%. We had expected more, however it worked out that the 15 answers were moderately similarly disseminated on the three classes. We don't contend that this little study is a delegate testing of all understudies that have partaken in this course, not to mention illustrative of the experience of working with ePortfolio for grown-up understudies at proceeding with schooling on the loose. Notwithstanding, from the explanations that the respondents give in the review, we track down various pertinent reflections and points of view on ePortfolio, both as a test and an opportunities for engaging the instructor's job, and for enabling understudies' learning measures.

Category
Sample Category #1
Commenting disabled.