Worku Aytenew message

The difficulties communicated by the understudies can be isolated in two classifications. The main classification has to do with computerized abilities. A portion of the understudies set forward low advanced abilities and low computerized certainty as the fundamental impediments for utilizing ePortfolio and feeling alright with the asset. 

The subsequent classification has to do with the didactics around and all through the ePortfolio interaction. A few understudies felt they never comprehended the justification behind and reason for utilizing ePortfolios, and tracked down this an impediment for taking part in the ePortfolio interaction. Others thought that it is hard to reflect without anyone else and didn't think that it is clear how the ePortfolio could function as wellspring of reflection. Another understudy likewise found that it extended his limits that he was making his appearance noticeable to other people, and as another understudy expressed: "you should be bold to open up". 

Backing required 

The reactions on help needed to utilize ePortfolio in current and further work communicated by the understudies show the requirement for computerized skill and feeling carefully positive about request to utilize the asset. 

The understudies focused on that if the computerized certainty isn't now there, you need an educator to furnish that sort of certainty to the understudies by showing substantial abilities and expertise connected with utilizing the ePortfolio. One more perspective focused by the understudies was the need of a working together local area around the utilization of the ePortfolio. The people group is here characterized as a functioning group of individual understudies or individual associates incorporating the IT-executive in the everyday schedule and others with administrative obligation of the setting explicit IT arrangements.