News from egypt

The accompanying rules depend on two fundamental sources: our own encounters as input providers and our encounters as coaches of the studio online criticism for clinical managers. Also, we investigated the writing on this point to get input for the studio. 

The studio was planned so that the clinical chiefs, further named input providers, could encounter the course of criticism giving and getting. It comprised of three rounds. In the first round, the members needed to compose a singular criticism on an invented e-portfolio task. In the second round they looked at and talked about every others composed input. It immediately turned out to be certain that every input varied a ton in content and style. We examined the qualities of the input and the reasoning behind composing it. In the third round we needed to rehash the criticism according to the viewpoint of the understudy as the input beneficiary. This was done to address the key inquiry: What sort of input would best help compelling learning? This studio was additionally given as a feature of the EEP meeting in Leuven, on February 22th 2018, at UCLL. 

Results 

We present the outcomes as explicit rules concerning the job of the criticism provider, the tone of the input, and its substance and style. We end for certain reflections on the setting of online criticism.