Ethiopian News November 19 2021 Mereja Today Abiy Ahmed

ow
743 Views
Published

It is easy to accept that we are responsible for the things we cause. However, there are several important questions to be answered. It may seem obvious that the agent pretends what he does, but this obvious is not easy to understand. If someone is intended to do, and that is the consequence of p, how do we decide if the actor also intends to be in addition to his intention to make p? Should the actor know the consequences of him? It is important that problems such as these are resolved. In the hearing room, in particular, this importance is not only theoretical but also a major legal problem: legal responsibility depends on the response given by the court.

 

Ethical or moral responsibility can not be identified through legal liability. Of course, as in legal cases, the actor is responsible for the actions of him and the consequences of them. In addition, corporations and organizations (and some other collective agents) are legal agents and, therefore, also legally responsible. This does not imply that corporations and organizations (or other collective agents) are ethical agents. It seems that intentionality or knowledge does not play a central role in ethical responsibility. If someone does something accidentally, he or she may not be legally responsible for it, but ethical responsibility occurs independently of intention or knowledge. The actor may think "should have been more careful" or "I am guilty of the result, even if he did not know the result in advance", and such thoughts express ethical or moral responsibility. It is one of the expressions of ethics; Ethics is something personal, something that the agent can not give or share. The history of Oedipus provides a strong expression of how ethical responsibility follows our actions, regardless of our knowledge or ours (good intentions).

Category
News
Commenting disabled.